The
Goldsmiths--Part XXVII
By R. D.
Bradshaw
An occasional reader of just a few Goldsmiths articles might
be led to believe that there are contradictory positions in this Goldsmiths
series on a deflationary fall/recession versus a hyperinflationary bust. To put things in perspective and prove no
inconsistencies, this presentation will clarify the two positions and show that
there are no contradictions in the two ideas as presented in the Goldsmiths.
Inflation versus
Deflation
The Goldsmiths have argued from Part I that the plutocrat
market manipulators are in total charge of the financial markets in the US,
Britain and much of the rest of the world.
In their capacity to control the markets, they are right now trying to
bring about a controlled deflationary fall/collapse/recession. As explained in Goldsmiths X, XII, XX, XXI, and
others, they have focused their attacks on home mortgages, real estate values
and commodities.
Presently, they have a move on to take gold down to $700,
silver down to $9, wheat down to $5, corn down to $3, soybeans down to $8, oil
down to $50 and everything else in grains, softs and energy all likewise
down. But while they have engineered
these falls in prices, they have not really done much on the overall inflation
reality.
After all, oil may be down some 60%, but the price of gas at
the pump is only down some 25%. It means
the oil companies are still raking in the money. Wheat is down some two-thirds from its 2008
high. But bread prices are not down (and
aren’t particularly affected because the cost of the wheat in a loaf of bread
is inconsequential, as outlined in Goldsmiths Part XV).
Actually, it is all academic to try to talk about inflation
because the manipulators control the official US inflation statistics and the
controlled media which periodically reports them. As we know, they have for years been telling
us that there is no inflation problem in the US. The latest is that inflation is now
flat. Of course this is the exact propaganda
needed for the manipulators to lower interest rates and increase US and Fed
spending programs and give-aways to the sky (as detailed in Goldsmiths X and
XVIII).
Conversely, this writer has also outlined the prospects of
an inflationary bust in Goldsmiths X, XX, etc.
In such an environment, we can look for the following as allowed in
Goldsmiths XXIII—coming price controls, higher interest rates, confiscation of
gold, restrictions on the movement of capital, shortages of goods, etc.
In the various Goldsmith presentations on these two positions,
there has been no inconsistency because it appears that the manipulators are
trying to impose the deflationary fall/recession on us at this time while the
hyperinflationary bust should come later.
Goldsmiths recognize this present motion under way by the fat cats. But as repeatedly suggested in this series,
there is the likelihood that the manipulators will lose control over the situation
and hyperinflation will thereby set in.
Reducing it to the simplest terms—we will first of all
likely have some deflation from the work of the manipulators; and then later a hyperinflationary
bust will occur when they lose control.
Most of the preceding Goldsmiths have outlined some of the ways that the
manipulators can lose control and have even offered some possible dates/clues
for such an event.
The point is that we probably will end up with both options—deflation
and then inflation.
Some Other Ideas
An article by
John Olaques on the “The Real Reason Behind the Bail Out” in the Oct 21, 2008
Goldseek.com offered some other thinking on this theme which has not received
much media play from economists or even the various market analysts and
advisory services. This article was outstanding
and Mr. Olaques deserves some credit for putting together precisely what the
plutocrat manipulators may be trying to do at present.
He gives the
backdrop for his conclusion by citing the ideas of Congressman Ron Paul and
Nobel Prize winning economist Milton Friedman on the reality that the expansion
of the money supply in circulation causes the public to want more goods than
are available. This demand pull
phenomenon causes inflation. Frankly,
almost every person who looks at the problem comes to about the same conclusion
(including me).
Olaques notes that during the Rosenfeldt
(this family later changed its name to Roosevelt) depression of the 1930s, the
Fed allowed or caused the monetary aggregates to decrease which contributed to
the depression.
Conversely, Olaques allows that
the extra money now being created by the Regulators
may never make its way to the consumers. If it does not, then there is no extra
demand for goods and services and no inflation and no recovery in the form of
extra production, extra jobs and prosperity.
He then concludes that “the question is whether the extra money supply from the
Bail-Out will reach the consumer/taxpayer. The sad answer is that very little will. Almost the entire Bail-Out will go to the
banks and insurance companies…Its purpose is to secure holders of bank bonds,
the holders of credit default swaps guaranteed by investment banks and
insurance companies and secure past and future excessive executive compensation
paid by those banks and insurance companies.”
This excellent article then adds that hyper-inflation will only take place if the increased
money supply goes to the hands of the consumers and does not create a
corresponding amount of debt (this point on creating debt is not clear since
debt will in any case be created by the national government). Hence, per Mr. Olaques, there may then be a
severe demand for dollars and hyper-deflation, where the country and the people
have no money to buy goods and services but only (service) debts.
For a conclusion, he
says that “The bankers have discovered a way to force the people of America and
the world into an intense form of debt slavery and that is the reason for their
reckless past lending practices, credit cards for all and now this massive Wall
Street Bankers Bail-Out. In the past,
only wars created that amount of national debt. But now those debt creating war
mongers have found the more friendly face of public bail-outs.”
The above noted
analytical thinking of Mr. Olaques is outstanding. What he proposes could well be reality both
in terms of what has brought on this present crisis and what the plutocrat masters
expect to achieve with it in the coming days.
In line with what
various Goldsmiths articles have said the evidence is massive that indeed the
fat cat manipulators have laid all of this present trouble on the American
people. They are in control and they are
making things happen (with the obvious objective of them making more profits
and gaining more control over the people).
I can easily
envision that indeed the plutocrats plan on these massive bail outs funneling
money to them where they can salt the proceeds away in such a manner that very
little of the bail out money will ever reach the market place to place a demand
on goods and services. In that case, we
well could have a shortage of dollars and a hyper deflationary depression which
will make the Rosenfeldt (alias Roosevelt) depression look like a cake
walk.
And how will the
big banks receiving the bail outs keep the money out of the hands of the
public? Undoubtedly, they will keep much
of that money in bank vaults in the form of US Treasury bonds and notes. Thus, the Fed and Treasury will buy up the
old worthless mortgages and pay them off with either US bonds/notes or money
for the big banks to use to buy US bonds/notes.
Of course, this
market for US paper will greatly help the Treasury in its efforts to sell US
IOUs. Thus, as Mr. Olaques notes, the US
taxpayers will be saddled with new debts which will go to the big banks and
other institutions. As noted in Goldsmiths,
XVIII, the US and Fed are already out in excess of $1.8 trillion bailing the fat
cats out. Probably very little of that
$1.8 trillion will ever reach the public to put demands on goods and services (to
cause inflation).
Other Relevant Factors
Whereas the plutocrats
have surely planned this scheme out, and intend to steal trillions more from
the US taxpayers before they are finished, there are some other factors which
need to be assessed in this discussion.
For example, I
have known for years now that the US government has been consistently lying to the
American public about the consumer and producer price indexes. John Williams (of shadowstats.com) and others
have documented reality that the real inflation rate is really something in the
order of 14% per annum. Even now, as the
government tells us that inflation is flat, we know it’s a lie. It may not be as much as 14%, but it’s far greater
than what we are being told.
While the US inflation rates have been substantially higher than what the US government
reports have said for the last 20 years, they have not been at the levels which
they should be at with the huge expansion of the US money supply. I have known this for some time and have
thought about what could be causing this strange phenomenon.
My thinking has always crystallized into the reality that
huge numbers of foreigners have been buying US paper and keeping that paper
overseas without turning it loose on the US market to chase goods and
service. These foreigners have traded
their good currency for US IOU paper.
In America, we have used this good foreign currency to buy consumer
goods produced by these same foreign countries (to keep these sales going,
foreign countries keep their own currencies devalued in terms of the dollar)
and to finance the deficit spending and give away programs of the US government
(thus, it means that America has been sending inflation to the foreign
countries involved).
We Americans have largely quit producing goods. Too, many Americans are now on welfare
programs of some type. The result is
that the excess expansion of the money supply has not hit the US market place
to cause a hyperinflationary blowout as should have happened long ago.
Per the thinking of Mr. Olaques, much of these bail out
funds also will never reach the US market place. If the Treasury can successfully sell its
bonds/notes to more foreigners, these foreigners may end up financing much of
this bail out. Very little of these
paper assets, as held by foreigners and/or the bailed out big banks, will reach
the US market place in the immediate foreseeable future.
Yet What Can
Happen
Never-the-less, at some point in time, that money either in
foreign countries or in the vaults of the big banks will eventually come back
to the US markets in some way. Holders
of this paper will become concerned with the huge quantities that they are
holding and begin buying up US assets.
Even the US dollars used to buy oil from other foreign countries will
pass to people who in time will want to look to purchase US assets.
Despite the limitations, some of this money can come back to
the US to buy real estate, stocks, and whatever else America has for sale. If the crops stay up, we can be sure that
foreign countries will buy American agricultural products (this will put demand
on US goods in the market places and must lead to some inflation). Already, US wheat sales abroad have been
quite good.
As the US debt situation deteriorates, I have already suggested
that ultimately some US war ships and other military assets will go on the
block for sale to foreigners. And while US
manufacturing has fallen in recent years, we still are one of the world’s
biggest producers of weapons of war.
There is another big factor which will nullify some of the
possibilities cited by Mr. Olaques. The
US is a socialist welfare country with much of this spending supported by government
deficit spending. This is not about to
end.
If there are any internal economic problems, we can be sure
that the US government, under both Republicans and Democrats, will spend money
like mad, not only to bail out the super rich but also to put some pennies into
the pockets of the collective people (to keep them pacified to continue to vote
for the status quo on who is to rule the nation).
There is a third thing which can cause the plutocrats
problems if they try to further rip us off by intentionally trying to make
their deflationary fall a deflationary bust and depression with a shortage of
dollars.
The US welfare state has changed the basic thinking of many
or indeed most Americans. We simply no
longer have a work ethic. In fact, many
Americans are quite lazy and are looking for ways to not work and especially in
so-called undesirable jobs. That’s why
persons from South of the Border have been flowing into the US for ages now to
do work which Americans simply won’t do.
The Goldsmiths, XX, outlined the huge change in the American
people from 1929 until today. We Americans
are totally different people from our ancestors of 80 years ago. There are not many farmers who are going to
work hard to sell corn at $3, wheat at $5 or soy beans at $8. I can tell you now; they will quit and go on
welfare or revolt.
The Rothschild cabal has successfully screwed the farmers
for vast ages. But one more rip off of
farmers, from the present plutocrat deflationary scheme, may not work. It could easily backfire.
The Bottom
Line
Finally, there are any number of things on the drawing
boards which also can completely upset the diabolical plans of the manipulators
as they plot and plan on putting the screws to us even more.
Any number of things can go wrong. I have already outlined several in the
context of the coming wars on Iran, Syria and others. Then there is the reality that at some point
in time, the Chinese, Japanese and others will say no more US IOUs. The Rothschild cabal will one day lose control. It is not whether but only when. And when they lose control, a hyperinflationary
bust will arrive on stage.
It is very likely that Mr. Olaques is right and the manipulators
are right now planning a deflationary bust, despite the huge expansion of the
US monetary supply (which should cause a hyperinflationary blow out). And while the fat cats may successfully work
this deflation scheme for awhile, their days of following it may be limited
(perhaps because of the several above stated reasons).
For More Reading/Information
For more reading on this issue,
the reader may wish to check these sources:
The bestseller: “None Dare Call It
Conspiracy,” by Gary Allen and Larry Abraham, first published in 1971, still
available on eBay, Amazon and other book outlets.
“Tragedy
and Hope,” by Carroll Quigley. At the
1992 Democrat Convention, Bill Clinton’s acceptance speech cited Quigley as
Clinton’s mentor.
“Conspirators’
Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300”: by Dr John Coleman. Order from World in Review, 2533 N Carson St,
Carson City, NV 89706, phone 1-800-942-0821.
An Internet presentation on the
Plutocrats, at Volume XXII of “Ezekiel and YHWH’s Judgment for the Good
People,” at www.age-end.com
on the net.
The author of
this article is not involved in the securities or financial market business and
has no financial interest in presenting the information herein. Therefore, the preceding information on this
subject is presented for general information only and not for purposes of
investment advise or recommendations.
What the reader does on investments is his own personal decision and
responsibility.
Finally,
the writer of this series is a retired CPA, living in the Idaho Mountains, and
still optimistic for the future of gold and silver. He is also a veteran of the Korean and
Vietnamese Wars.
Click here to
go to the home page of www.analysis-news.com.